inner-background-image

Always a defense attorney,
NEVER a prosecutor

MY PRACTICE IS DEVOTED TO THE DEFENSE OF CRIMINAL
CASES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF FLORIDA

person-image
Is Florida’s Ban on Smoking Medical Marijuana Unconstitutional?
Posted by: Thomas Grajek  | On 29th June, 2018

Marijuana Joint

In 2016, Floridians voted to amend the state’s constitution to authorize doctors to prescribe medical marijuana to patients suffering from debilitating medical conditions. But several of the high-profile individuals who lobbied for this constitutional amendment are now arguing it doesn’t go far enough—it still prohibits the smoking of medical marijuana, which some claim is their safest method of marijuana consumption. Read on to learn more about the proposed statutory changes for which some medical marijuana patients are lobbying.

Florida’s Medical Marijuana Amendment

Florida’s marijuana laws can be tricky to decipher now that medicinal marijuana is legal.  After the constitutional amendment was approved in 2016, the Florida legislature passed a law to codify this amendment and provide doctors, patients, and law enforcement officers with some guidelines for the legal use of medical marijuana. However, this law bans the smoking of marijuana, which a group of plaintiffs argues is an unconstitutional conflict with the 2016 amendment (which did not specifically approve or ban smoking).

On the other side of this argument are lawmakers and health experts who argue that smoking anything is not a therapeutic treatment and therefore not required by the constitutional amendment. The state’s Solicitor General, representing the legislature in this legal battle, argues that banning the smoking of marijuana is well within the legislature’s power to establish health and safety guidelines. With courts around the country upholding bans on cigarette smoking in public places, the Solicitor General argues, a ban on smoking marijuana—still classified as an illegal substance under federal law–is no different.

Is the Marijuana Smoking Ban Unconstitutional?

The constitutional amendment itself broadly defines marijuana as “all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis.” Because this includes the parts of the marijuana plant normally used for smoking, the plaintiffs argue, the legislative ban on smoking marijuana violates the constitutional amendment’s plain language.

But proponents of the legislature’s statute argue that the amendment’s authorization to enact laws “consistent” with it extends to banning smoking marijuana, so long as the prescribed drug can still be consumed in other forms. They point out that there are a number of ways to derive THC and other active ingredients from each part of the plant and use these ingredients in edibles, vaporizable oils and waxes, and other products that don’t generate secondhand smoke. But one of the plaintiffs in this case argues that smoking is the only way she can safely consume marijuana, and therefore the law restricting her ability to smoke marijuana should be struck down.

Whether the amendment permitting medical marijuana under Florida law should grant doctors the ability to prescribe marijuana joints (as opposed to edibles, suppositories, or vaping) is still up for debate. Depending on the outcome of this lawsuit, the legislature may decide to amend its law to carve out certain exceptions for patients whose doctors have specifically recommended smoking as a therapeutic treatment. Alternatively, the legislature may be forced to amend this law if the Florida Supreme Court determines it’s an unconstitutional restriction on the 2016 medical marijuana amendment.

Source

http://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/01/25/why-cant-this-als-patient-be-allowed-to-smoke-medical-marijuana/

https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2018/05/17/florida-judge-weighs-state-ban-on-patients-smoking-pot/?slreturn=20180513223430

Tags:

29

Jun 2018

Fri

comments are closed

Lakeland

206 Easton Dr #102 Lakeland, FL, 33803

(863) 688-4606

Tampa

4107 N. Himes Ave #200 Tampa, FL, 33607

(813) 789-6404

Lutz

24140 FL-54 #101e Lutz, FL, 33559

(727) 457-8660

Categories

Archives

Testimonials

Thomas Grajek is a great lawyer

After my husbands DUI, I met with a couple of lawyers but NONE were as attentive as Thomas Grajek. Thomas was able to beat the DUI charge that I thought would be impossible. Not only did he save us money, he also helped put our lives back. I would recommend Mr. Grajek to anyone in our situation. Thsnkd Tom!!!

Thomas Grajek is a great lawyer

Excellent Attorney....called this attorney on a Saturday. He was quick to call me back and even gave me free advice as to how to handle the situation we were in. We ended up hiring him best decision we made. Would recommend this attorney to anyone.

Thomas Grajek is a great lawyer

Got a DUI a few months ago and got Toms name from a friend of mine.. I am more then satisfied with the way he handled my case and the way he kept me informed the whole time.. I got off on reckless with a with hold which i am more then happy to have on my record then a dui... He's a very down to earth guy and definitely trys to relate to where ur comin from.. I would with no doubt recommend Tom to friends and family... Thanks Tom ur the best!!!!!!

Thomas Grajek is a great lawyer

Great DUI Lawyer!! He got my DUI dropped to a reckless driving charge!! definitely went above and beyond for my case!!!He is very easily accessible and always promptly returned my phone calls/emails.

Thomas Grajek is a great lawyer

I have just moved to the Tampa area. I was intoduced to Tom after being arrested for a DUI. Within minutes of being bonded out Tom came to my place of employment with all needed documents to "get the ball rolling". He always kept me informed on my case and when the time came for my hearing, I plead guilty to wreckless and had no fines and very little commuity service. Thomas Grajek is a great attorney and I feel he would be a valuable assett in anyone's defense.